While I do support local businesses, I am opposed to the zoning change in a rural residential area to accommodate one. Those of us who have chosen to live in Southfork did so with the conscious desire to live in a rural setting. I moved to the area intending to be unencumbered by commercial properties encroaching on water resources, wildlife habitats, and the natural beauty of the neighborhood. Spot zoning of Spring Creek has already been opposed by several groups, Southfork should be no different as there has been no proof of environmental impact studies or a true census of the resident's support. The safety of the community and its wildlife should be considered above the monetary gains of people who don't even reside in the area.

Thanks to the Carters info, I oppose as well.

I too am in extreme opposition of the location of the zoning change in South Fork. This is a residential area that already has a couple commercial properties and no more are needed. The proposed zoning change is a threat to our way of rural living, our water, and our wildlife. Have there been any environmental impact studies done? Public safety is also a major concern as there is only one way in and one way out of Lucky Nugget area where emergency vehicles and services are concerned. The school bus stop is also of concern as our area’s children load and unload the buses adjacent from this proposed business site. Increased traffic and crime are a danger to the children. Please take these public comments in to account when making your decisions.

I STRONGLY oppose the location of the zoning change in South Fork. In April of 2022, the County Surveyor is publicly quoted stating he is against "spot-zoning" of Spring Creek. What is his motivation for recommending spot zoning of South Fork? Clearly, more residents oppose the zoning change than support, even though Mr. Rice mislead the room by stating otherwise in the Planning Commission Meeting in August 2023. There are already commercially zoned properties in South Fork & we do not need to create any more, especially in the residential area. Allowing for commercialization in our residential area opens the door for even more growth & development. Not everywhere in Elko County needs developed. Some places are better left safe from "progress" to protect the water basin & wildlife. Not enough research has been done to understand the impacts of business development in the area & changing of zoning should at least be delayed. What an additional slap in the face to the ranchers whose property was taken from them via imminent domain to create the reservoir in the first place. The proposed business owners do not live in South Fork & won't deal with the unintended negative consequences of lack of maintenance, law enforcement constraints, & impeding on the families who chose South Fork many years ago to stay away from business zones & enjoy the wildlife & scenery. Please follow the original South Fork Master Plan & do not support the change in zoning.